GRANT
NUMBER:
NA36FD0178
NMFS NUMBER:
92-AKR-001
REPORT
TITLE:
Economic Considerations of Alternative Management Measures
in the Alaska Red King Crab and Snow Crab Fisheries
AUTHOR:
University
of Alaska Fairbanks, Department of Resources Management
PUBLISH
DATE: May
17, 1996
AVAILABLE
FROM:
National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Region, 709
W. 9th Street, 4th Floor, P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99801.
PHONE: (907) 586-7224
ABSTRACT

This study
examines an overview of the history and current status
of Alaska's Bering Sea snow crab and Bristol Bay red king
crab fisheries. Management history is covered and
special management considerations emanating from biological
characteristics of the crab stocks are examined. An econometrics
evaluation of pot limits and proposed license limitations
is presented and a theoretical overview of ITQs is provided.
Socio-economic outcomes of transferable quota management
in Iceland, New Zealand, and Australia--the three nations
with the oldest and most extensive ITQ systems--as well
as the Mid-Atlantic surf clam and quahog fisheries-the
first major ITQ experiment in the United States, are reviewed.
A theoretical scenario for IFQ management in the BSAI
crab fisheries is set up. A likely pattern of initial
distributions is sketched, assuming that recipients of
licenses under the newly adopted license program would
be eligible for quota, and that the amount each receives
would be based on his historical catch, using a formula
similar to that adopted for the halibut and sablefish
program. An economic analysis of Individual Transferable
Pot Quotas (ITPQs) was presented to the Council, as part
of the Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review
for the License Limitation Alternatives for the Groundfish
and Crab Fisheries in the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea
Aleutian Islands (NPFMC 1994). ITPQs were subsequently
rejected by the Council as a possible option for comprehensive
rationalization of the BSAI crab fisheries. What comes
across in the crab management debate is that before selecting
a management plan for any fishery it is important to define
the goals of management: whether to ensure maximum profitability
to the industry, to secure the fisheries competitiveness,
to ensure weak profits to many of strong profits to a
few, to maximize employment, to protect the integrity
of isolated communities, to ensure consumers a steady
supply of high quality fish, to focus on present-day problems
or for managers to try to include the financial health
of future generations of fishers in their calculations.